Architects Corner

WHAT, WHY & HOW OF DOING ENTERPRISE, BUSINESS AND IT ARCHITECTURE by CEO iCMG

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Archives
    Archives Contains a list of blog posts that were created previously.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in Enterprise Architecture
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 8114

Why Enterprise Architects don't have a seat in CEO's Meeting?

Why Enterprise Architects don't have a seat in CEO's Meeting?

Globally, organizations are working on offsetting economic dampening behavior with new products and services in regular interval. CEOs are working hard to retain their market share. Very often, results are not favorable due to inherent business complexity and associated business structure. As a result, even incremental changes are expensive and time-consuming.

In Nov 2014, Chief Executive magazine reported that nearly 90% of the CEO's have failed to meet their target. Nearly, 40 CEOs in the Retail industry alone are replaced in 2014 that include likes of Walmart, Barnes & noble, GAP etc.


Ideally speaking Enterprise Architecture should have been used for engineering or re-engineering of an enterprise.

Unfortunately, it's not so. In fact, current breed of Enterprise Architects are not part of direct meetings with CEOs. REcently, one of the Chief Architect confided that he had only one meeting with the CEO for the whole of the last year.


So, here we have a interesting scenario. In one hand we have several enterprises facing disorders which if not treated in time, might result in nemesis of enterprise. On the other hand, we have emerging decipline (Enterprise Architecture) which is supposed to address the enterprise disorders in a timely and consistent manner.

The questions is why two don't meet? There are several reasons why it has happened:

1. Business Managers see "Enterprise Architecture" as a descipline for IT folks as its origin come from people who worked in IT companies at some point of time. Interestingly, they keep sponsoring IT team for training and certification in Enterprise Architecture

2. If at all any skill available for doing Enterprise Architecture exists, it is still largely concentrated around IT team.

Krish Ayyar, Director iCMG Australia added that Enterprise Architecture is still seen as an IT activity, i.e to manage the IT complexity rather than an approach to solve Business problems. It is partly but not fully the Enterprise Architect's fault. Many organisations don't even have Business Strategists. It is all operational. Situation will improve when EA's have a mandate to and present information on the basis of Capabilities, Functionalities, Services, Service Qualities etc., without using any Technology, Vendor and Product related jargons. In fact, Krish wrote a blog "Can CIO's afford to ignore Enterprise Architecture any more?

3. Most of the trainers who teach this subject are IT practitioners who continue to use Enterprise Architecture for IT solutions

4. Business Strategists' hands are full helping their customers with "best practises". You will not hear a "strategist" being fired because they can always blame the failure to "implementation" and escape. The real problem is lack of understanding of the underlying "engineering" principles and building blocks of an "enterprise" i.e. enterprise anatomy. Several of them are like alchemists of pre Peridoc Table era driven by "best practise" i.e. I know this works. In fact, HBR's Top 100 CEOs list, over 70% of the CEOs are "insiders". This clearly drives the point that it takes long years to master the "building blocks" of an enterprise. There is definite "anatomy" and "pattern" of communications among components. And defining a strategy in absence of drawing a line to "realization" or "tranformation" would look like "day dreaming".

5.Business Process Experts think "Enterprise Architecture" is subset of "BPM"???? So, if an organization does BPM, Enterpise Architecture is not needed.
Infact, I would hear several BPM experts say this for years. Only last 2-3 years reality has dawned and they get it right.
Infact, confusion in this descipline can be gauzed from the fact that there are over 400 BPM methodologies? May be every expert has one?

The list will go on...

What we are failing to realize that everything is part of "enterpise". Every enterprise has an "anatomy". There are several building blocks (organs) for an enterprise such as strategy, rules, processes, network, data etc. Which is more important? It's wrong question. You will never find two doctors arguing about which is more imoprtant human organ? Did you?

But, argument among enterpise practitioners about data more important or application?..is a common sight.

From a CEO's perspective, it is about solving “Enterprise” problems, in time, right first time.

IMHO, Business Managers are most suited to solve enterprise disorders while iteratively and incrementally building out the inventory of complete, reusable, primitive models (building blocks) that constitute: Enterprise Architecture.


I guess the real problem is lack of understanding of "enterprise anatomy" by enterprise practitioners. Just imagine if the collective wisdoms of hundreds and thousands of enterpise parctitioners are channelised into common understanding, its impact on creating enterprises which are "durable" and which can provide services which are "economical".

Today, almost all enterprises are wasting their costly resources in fighting internal "disorders". I wish if those resources are used in a effective manner to isolate disorders and address them in a timely and consistent manner. This will help CEOs to bring next set of products and services
which will strengthen evolution of society around the globe.

Most business strategists (having seat in CEO's meeting, today!) are oblivious to existence of idea of "enterprise architecture". Is it learning something which has originated from IT is not worth? Imagine refusing to accept Thomas Edison's work like "Bulb", Electricity" just because his early career as a telegraph operator.


In order to address the above issues, we have recently launched a new program "Enterprise Architecture for Decisions Makers."

With carefully chosen case studies and hands on practise sessions, business managers can learn how to address business problems using above technique. In addition, you will also learn how one can manage multiple disorders at the same time. What makes this methodology effective is the ability to manage the whole thing in a 45 days cycle i.e. lean and timeliness.


With the help of enterprise stakeholders like you, this workshop will make a genuine efforts to bring the descipline back into the hands where it matters. No doubt, you want to have your seat in CEO's meeting? We can help. ;-)

Share your opinion, take this poll:

 

Related Blogs:

"Enterprise Architecture for Decision Makers" - New Workshop Announced

Are You Modeling Business Architecture Using Excel & PowerPoint?

Anatomy of Business Strategy - and Why it Fails Often

Why You Can't Get Money For Your Enterprise Architecture Projects

22 Answers from John Zachman that will change your perception about Enterprise Architecture and his framework-part 1

iCMG Awards 27 Companies for Excellence in Enterprise, Business and IT Architecture in 2014

 

 

I appreciate your time, will await your your feedback and comments in the "comments" section below. BTW,  please do share with your network if you like this blog.

Connect with me in Architects Corner  | Join Business Architecture User Group

 

 
Starting at $398 for 2 hours
  Linkedin eLearning 001    
$999 inclusive of Level I Certification
 
Strategy, process, transformation

 

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
35

Comments

  • Sunil Dutt Jha
    Sunil Dutt Jha Monday, 01 June 2015

    1.Business Managers see "Enterprise Architecture" as a descipline for IT folks as its origin come from people who worked in IT companies at some point of time
    2.If at all any skill available for doing Enterprise Architecture exists, it is still largely concentrated around IT team
    3.Most of the trainers who teach this subject are IT practitioners who continue to use Enterprise Architecture for IT solutions
    4.Business strategists are oblivious to existence of Enterprise Architecture
    5.Business Process Experts think "Enterprise Architecture" is subset of "BPM"

  • Sunil Dutt Jha
    Sunil Dutt Jha Monday, 01 June 2015

    Take the poll : Why Enterprise Architects don't have a seat in CEO's Meeting? and share your thoughts
    http://live.icmgworld.com/index.php/user-polls/viewpoll/143-why-enterprise-architects-don-t-have-a-seat-in-ceo-s-meeting.html

Leave your comment

Guest
Guest Saturday, 23 July 2016
SSL